Our editorial approach

At WRDI Project, accuracy and clarity come first. Every post is based on publicly available information from credible, verifiable sources — including legislation, court filings, government reports, and independent news sources.

We rely on a mix of primary sources (such as official documents) and reputable secondary reporting (such as AP and Reuters). When advocacy or academic organizations are used, they’re cited and balanced with additional verification whenever possible.

Each post is reviewed for:

• Source quality and diversity — facts must be confirmed by at least one primary or reputable secondary source.
• Neutral tone — WRDI avoids editorializing and emotional language.
• Timeliness — every Summary section includes a date stamp to reflect when the information was last verified.

“Why It Matters” sections highlight context and potential implications. They reflect the best available interpretation of the evidence — often supported by expert or institutional perspectives. They are not meant to be opinion pieces.

If an error is discovered, WRDI will correct it promptly and note the change at the bottom of the post. Accuracy and transparency aren’t afterthoughts; they’re the foundation of trust.

Corrections & Updates
WRDI Project strives to ensure every post reflects accurate, up-to-date information. If you notice an error or omission, please reach out at info@wrdi.org.

Information on this site represents the best available data as of the publication date and is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice or professional counsel.