How federal laws set the baseline for women’s health, safety, and access
Federal laws play a powerful role in shaping women’s rights in the United States. Even when enforcement and impact
1 min read
In 2021, California guaranteed mail-in voting for registered voters under AB 37, which permanently required election officials to mail ballots to every active voter. In 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a far-right challenge to California’s system, affirming its legality.
Why it Matters
For Californians, this means mail-in ballots remain a secure, permanent feature of every election. Residents continue to benefit from multiple ways to vote, including by mail, same-day registration, automatic registration at the DMV, and youth pre-registration.
Background
California adopted temporary universal mail-in ballots during the pandemic and later made the practice permanent with AB 37. The 2025 court ruling underscored the resilience of the system against legal attacks, keeping California’s voting access among the broadest in the country.
Resources
KQED - California Adopts Vote-by-Mail System for All Future Elections
Public Policy Institute of California - Vote-by-Mail and Voter Turnout in the Pandemic Election
Read next
How laws, courts, and access shape what “protected” really means
The word “protected” sounds definitive. In everyday language, it suggests something settled—a right that’s been secured and placed
How law, enforcement, and power have shaped women’s access to the ballot
Women’s right to vote in the United States is often described as a single milestone: the ratification of the
Voting in NY: when courts, not voters, end up shaping the rules
New York’s voting system has been repeatedly reshaped by court rulings rather than voter-driven or legislative consensus. In recent
The SAVE Act is back. Here’s why women should pay attention.
The SAVE Act has once again passed the House and is moving to the Senate. As in 2025, the bill