How federal laws set the baseline for women’s health, safety, and access
Federal laws play a powerful role in shaping women’s rights in the United States. Even when enforcement and impact
The 2025 One Big Beautiful Big Act (H.R.1) introduces sweeping changes to the Medicaid program—stricter eligibility and verification rules, increased administrative burdens, and significantly reduced federal funds to the tune of almost $911 billion over 10 years. These changes, with some taking effect as early as January 2026, put millions of low-income women, caregivers, long-term care residents, and women living in rural areas at increased risk of facing serious interruptions in care.
For context, nearly 1 in 5 women (25 million) in the US rely on Medicaid. It is the single largest public source of funding for family planning services, and finances care for 60% of nursing home residents.
Here's a quick summary of the changes most likely to impact women:
For the 25 million women who rely on Medicaid, these cuts will be incredibly harmful. Their options for care will dramatically decrease, forcing them to travel further, pay out of pocket, or give up some services completely - whether it's health screenings, pregnancy wellness exams, contraception or nursing home services. But there will also be collateral damage to women not on Medicaid, especially in rural areas where clinics, hospitals, and assisted living facilities are already limited. In fact, the looming cuts are already causing maternity wards to close in rural hospitals (100 since 2020) and raising alarms for states that are battling increasing infant and maternal mortality rates.
Medicaid plays a central role in women’s health care in the US: it finances a large share of births (up to 40%), supports postpartum visits, covers contraception and STI care, and enables preventive screening for cancer. When Medicaid funding is interrupted or lost entirely, the ripple effects may include loss of access to essential services, delayed care, and increased health risks.
In 2018, when Arkansas briefly implemented a Medicaid work requirement, over 18,000 people lost coverage in just a few months. Studies later showed that most of them were working or should have been exempt, but they lost coverage because of confusing rules and reporting systems. The same would likely happen under a national mandate, but on a much larger scale.
The following facts might help to put the cuts and impact into a better perspective:
There are so many good resources out there about the history of Medicaid, statistics on spending and enrollee data, etc. My main ones are:
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities - Introduction to Medicaid
KFF - Allocating CBO’s Estimates of Federal Medicaid Spending Reductions Across the States: Enacted Reconciliation Package
Commonwealth Fund - Medicaid Cuts Could Increase Maternal Mortality and Jeopardize Women’s Health
Center For Children and Families - Worth Repeating: Pregnant Women, Infants, Young Children are NOT Protected in Proposed Medicaid Cuts
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities - 2025 Budget Stakes: Proposals Would Harm Women
Georgetown University - The Truth About Medicaid Coverage for Immigrants – and the Looming Threats
Guttmacher Institute - The right is waging a quiet war on contraception (opinion)