How federal laws set the baseline for women’s health, safety, and access
Federal laws play a powerful role in shaping women’s rights in the United States. Even when enforcement and impact
In November, the U.S. Department of Education proposed a definition change that could reshape access to graduate programs in several essential and female-dominated fields. Here’s what to know:
Women make up the vast majority of workers in essential careers like nursing, social work, public health, counseling, and education — sectors already facing serious staffing shortages. Most require graduate education, and many students rely heavily on federal loans to complete clinical or practicum hours that make outside work impossible.
Limiting federal loan access would directly:
For these reasons, the impact of this decision will not be gender neutral. Policies that reduce access to graduate training in caregiving and science-related professions effectively limit women’s economic mobility, career options, and long-term earning power.
The proposal would limit the “professional degrees" category primarily to medicine, law, and dentistry. Degrees in nursing, social work, education, public health, and counseling could lose access to higher federal loan caps that many students rely on.
In addition to being heavily female, these professions hold communities together, from emergency rooms to classrooms to social service agencies.
This policy change is directly tied to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA), passed earlier this year. As part of that bill, Graduate PLUS loans, which previously allowed students to borrow up to their total cost of attendance, will be eliminated as of July 1, 2026.
For clarification, graduate and professional students will see new borrowing limits of up to $20,500 per year ($100,000 total) for "graduate studies" and $50,000 a year ($200,000 total) for "professional" programs.
Here's the list of professional programs that would qualify for higher loan limits:
Broader policy context: Project 2025
All of this activity parallels themes in Project 2025, which calls for reducing federal student-aid spending, scaling back oversight of higher education, and limiting federal support for many of the same fields. Both frameworks emphasize shifting more financial responsibility to individual students and private lenders.
Inside Higher Ed - Project 2025 Would Radically Overhaul Higher Ed. Here's How
American Nurses Association - Statement from the American Nurses Association on Proposed Federal Loan Policy Changes
Union of Concerned Scientists - Limiting Professional Education Loans Is an Attack on Women, Science, and Healthcare