The gender pay gap is widening again. Why?
Recent data shows the gender pay gap widened again in 2025, in both hourly and salaried occupations, continuing a concerning shift after years of slow progress. Women earned about 82. …
As of March 2026, women’s rights in the United States remain uneven and continue to shift through a mix of federal policy changes and widening state differences. In recent months, federal agencies have revisited policies affecting reproductive healthcare access, childcare regulation, and civil rights enforcement—changes that shape how existing protections operate in practice.
At the same time, states are moving in sharply different directions, with some expanding protections such as paid leave or reproductive healthcare safeguards while others pursue new restrictions. As a result, access to healthcare, workplace protections, safety, and voting rights still depend heavily on where a woman lives and how laws are enforced.
What we're watching: Several federal developments could shape women’s rights in the months ahead. The Department of Defense has launched a six-month review examining the effectiveness of women serving in ground combat roles, a process that could influence future military personnel policies. Meanwhile, Congress is again considering the DEFIANCE Act, which would allow victims of nonconsensual sexually explicit images—including AI-generated deepfakes—to seek civil damages, reflecting growing concern about technology-enabled sexual exploitation and limited legal protections for victims.
Abortion access remains deeply uneven across the country. While federal inquiries into medication abortion have been delayed, any future changes to FDA policy would affect access nationwide. At the same time, a growing number of states have enacted shield laws and expanded protections, becoming access hubs for patients traveling from states with bans or severe restrictions—often straining clinics and providers. Emergency abortion care for miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, and other complications also remains unsettled as hospitals navigate conflicting interpretations of federal EMTALA requirements and state abortion laws.
Federal administrative policy is also beginning to influence reproductive care access. In early 2026, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services rescinded guidance requiring federally funded pharmacies to provide medication abortion without discrimination, leaving decisions increasingly to individual pharmacists and state law. At the same time, new restrictions within the Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system have limited abortion access for veterans, narrowing care options for some patients who previously relied on federal facilities.
Beyond abortion, access to reproductive healthcare is increasingly constrained by funding and infrastructure. Threats to Medicaid, Title X family planning funds, and ACA subsidies are straining clinics and hospitals already under pressure by reducing coverage and leaving providers to absorb more unpaid care. At the same time, hospital and clinic closures (Planned Parenthood) and obstetric provider shortages—especially in rural areas—are creating healthcare deserts where contraception, cancer screenings, prenatal care, and postpartum services are difficult or impossible to access.
These gaps hit low-income and rural women first, but rising premiums and fewer providers increasingly affect women across all income levels. In several states, restrictions on gender-affirming care have further narrowed access for transgender women and girls, contributing to provider shortages and increasing barriers to routine, preventive, and mental healthcare.
Immigration enforcement activity in some regions has also raised new concerns about access to prenatal care and preventive reproductive services, as fear of detention or deportation discourages some patients from seeking care.
National workplace protections for women remain limited and are weakening in some areas. The federal government has eliminated DEI requirements in its own workplaces, and many large employers are scaling back equity programs tied to fair pay, promotion, and discrimination protections. There is still no national paid family or medical leave law, leaving protections to vary widely by state and employer.
Federal childcare policy may also shift. The administration has proposed changes to the Child Care and Development Fund rules adopted during the previous administration, which were designed to stabilize childcare providers and improve payment reliability. If finalized, these changes could affect childcare availability and costs for working families.
At the same time, state-level paid leave programs continue to expand. As more states implement or extend paid family and medical leave laws, roughly one-third of U.S. workers now live in states with some form of paid leave coverage.
Legal protections addressing domestic and sexual violence largely remain in place, but the systems supporting survivors are under strain. Funding shortages, staffing challenges, and limited capacity have reduced access to shelters, counseling, and legal support in many areas. As a result, safety increasingly depends on local resources, creating gaps between formal protections and the help women can reliably access.
Women continue to play a growing role in elections and civic leadership, but federal safeguards for fair participation face renewed pressure. Ongoing challenges to the Voting Rights Act, combined with state-level voter ID laws and redistricting changes, could reshape access and representation ahead of the 2026 elections.
Congress is also debating new federal voting requirements. The House of Representatives has again passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, legislation that would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—such as a passport or birth certificate—to register to vote in federal elections. Supporters frame the proposal as an election integrity measure, while critics warn it could create new barriers for eligible voters who lack easy access to these documents. Voting experts note that documentation requirements could be particularly complicated for some married women whose current legal names do not match the names on their birth certificates.
Gender equity in education is increasingly shaped by state and local policy rather than consistent federal oversight. Weakened enforcement of Title IX has left protections uneven for pregnant students, LGBTQ+ students, and those facing harassment.
At the same time, many states have enacted or proposed laws restricting transgender girls’ participation in sports or access to bathrooms and school facilities, creating inconsistent rules and heightened scrutiny within schools. New federal degree-classification changes have also raised concerns about the devaluation of women-dominated fields, with impacts varying widely across states and institutions.
A recent Government Accountability Office report also raised concerns that staffing cuts and reduced resources within federal civil rights enforcement offices may be limiting the government’s ability to investigate discrimination complaints in schools.
The SAVE ACT is back. Here's why women should pay attention (Jan 26)